| Editors: | F. Kongoli, I. Chung, H. Kageyama, M.G. Kanatzidis, F. Marquis, A. Navrotsky, A. Tressaud, J. Atwood, G. Duca, R. Kuroda, A. Legocki, J. Lipkowski, M. Zaworotko, R. Singh, R. Gupta, M. Halama, D. Macdonald, F. Wang |
| Publisher: | Flogen Star OUTREACH |
| Publication Year: | 2025 |
| Pages: | 262 pages |
| ISBN: | 978-1-998384-62-4 (CD) |
| ISSN: | 2291-1227 (Metals and Materials Processing in a Clean Environment Series) |
The surface tensiometry technique leads to determine skin hydration status [1], using the contact angle method [2] with water as the liquid test, and surface tension of a liquid, using pendant drop method [3, 4], in a quick and non-invasive way. Bioenergy Field Treatments represent an approach to treating chronic diseases by assessing an individual's physiological and emotional responses through their own bioenergetic body, and is an integration into traditional medicine [5]. Our first objective was to measure the bio-informational fields applied at mineral and sparkling water drops to evaluate differences in their volume.
Our second objective was to provide the bio-informational field treatment with a tool capable of measuring effectiveness through analytics capable of determining changes in skin hydration levels and surface tensiometry. Two Prano Surface Tensiometry Units were implemented in Milan and Maserada Sul Piave (Italy) to realize our research aims.
The bio informational fields were applied in vivo by placing the hands at a 5 cm distance for 3' from the test subject's skin and pendant natural and sparkling water drops [response X, Xs]. An expert pranopractic (true before [O] and after [X] treatment) applied the bio informational fields and a non pranopratic (sham before [Os] and after [Xs] treatment) as reference which responses were respectively [X] and [Xs]. The data were compared with correspondent controls [O] and [Os].
The results demonstrated that the effect of the action of true and sham pranopractics on the pendant drop volume variations have statistical differences (P-value = 0.00000 for both kind of waters for [O], [X] and [O,X], while for [Os] natural with [15]=23.32 and sparkling with t[15]=39.48 waters showed both p (>|t|) <.0001, [Xs] natural with t[15]=-68.75 and sparkling with t[15]=-77.95 waters showed both p (>|t|) <.0001, and for [Os, Xs] natural with t[15]=-7.90 and sparkling with t[15]=18.58 waters showed both p (>|t|) <.0.0001).
The effect of the action of true and sham pranopractics on the water contact angle variations measured on forehead skin demonstrated statistical differences confirming that skin hydration change after the application of bio-informational fields by the true pranopractic to each test subjects involved in PTSU2 (p (>|t|) <.0001* for sham with t[8]=25.82 and true with t[8]=19.77 pranopractic both, p (>|t|)=0.6886 for sham with t[8]=-0.41 and p (>|t|) =0.8599 for true with t[8]=-0.18 pranopractics). The analysis of variance of water contact angles measured in PTSU 2 also showed 95% subject CI [4.1013633, 163.12], 95% residue CI [23.08, 107.13], and p (Wald)=0.0303 confirming both the existence of trend variations of water contact angle between the true and sham pranopractics however the differences are not statistically significant.
Results open the hypothesis of skin hydration variations trends and water pendant drop volume concerning control measurements after the bio informational fields application.
Our work combined non-invasive bio-informational field treatment with non-invasive surface tensiometry analytical approach using the contact angle method and water as a biocompatible liquid test. The results are preliminary and open new perspectives in a large-scale bio informational fields application to perform deep statistical analysis.