FLOGEN Logo
In Honor of Nobel Laureate Dr. Aaron Ciechanover

SIPS 2025 logo
SIPS 2025 takes place from November 17-20, 2025 at the Dusit Thani Mactan Resort in Cebu, Philippines

Honoree Banner

More than 400 abstracts submitted from over 50 countries
Abstracts Still Accepted for a Limited Time



Featuring many Nobel Laureates and other Distinguished Guests

ADVANCED PROGRAM

Orals | Summit Plenaries | Round Tables | Posters | Authors Index


Click to download the displayed program

Oral Presentations


SESSION:
EconomyTuePM2-R8
Tang International Symposium (Intl. Symp. on Economy and Commerce for Sustainable Development)
Tue. 18 Nov. 2025 / Room: Benjarong-Phuket
Session Chairs: Tamara Mandelburger; Santiago Maya; Charles Tang; Student Monitors: TBA

14:25: [EconomyTuePM205] OL Keynote
FINDING AND MEASURING THE 11TH R: TRANSCENDING THE CIRCULAR TO THE REGENERATIVE ECONOMY
Norman Dytianquin1; Simon Paindavoine2; Leonard Thoma3
1Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands; 2SKEMA Business School, Lille, France; 3Technical University of Applied Sciences, Wuerzburg-Schweinfurt, Germany
Paper ID: 186 [Abstract]

As an emerging concept in economics and business, regeneration straddles the blurred lines between allied concepts of sustainability and the circular economy. Whereas sustainability is about the balance of the so-called triple bottom line, and whilst circularity progresses a step further by looping back waste as inputs to the production process, the regenerative economy and business models promote ecological integrity by ensuring planetary provisions and societal wellness. This is done through its replenishment or restorative or rebuilding function. Replenish means to fill again what has been used up, restore is to put or bring back to an original state while rebuild is to reconstruct something that has been damaged or destroyed. The latter two terms of restoring and rebuilding have common elements though with the other Rs of the circular economy such as repairing, refurbishing, or remanufacturing, where some form of restoration and rebuilding transpires. Replenishment therefore is the more appropriate eleventh R added to the 10 Rs of the circular economy comprising Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Reuse, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle and Recover introduced by Potting & Hanemaaijer (2018).

The need to replenish resources is crucial due to the limits on production imposed by the earth’s carrying capacity. In ecological terms, carrying capacity is defined as the maximum number of a species that can sustainably live or thrive in a given area.  In other words, a population’s carrying capacity is the size at which a population can no longer grow due to the lack of supporting resources. The carrying capacity is defined as the environment's maximal load, which in population studies correspond to the population equilibrium, when the number of deaths in a population equals the number of births (including immigration and emigration).  Hence, it is imperative to transcend circularity that reduces waste to regeneration that warrants that the planet’s carrying capacity is not breached.

As for regenerative business, this paper uses the concept of business models with respect to the elements of a business model proposed by Richardson (2008), Teece (2010), and Osterwalder & Pigneur (2005, 2011) comprising value proposition (marketing), value creation (R&D and production), value delivery (supply chain and logistics) and value capture (finance). The sustainability dimension to business models were introduced by Bocken et al. (2014) with eight archetypes classified into three groupings of mechanisms and later expanded on by Clinton and Whisnant (2014) with 20 distinct sustainable business models grouped into five categories, and Toth (2019) with 15 sustainable business movements. Using this conceptual framework, this research introduces a new typology of regenerative business models, circular production and circular consumption business models and will use a qualitative approach of selected case studies of regenerative business models juxtaposed with the circular business models to showcase the differences using environmental, social, and economic indicators.  The case studies of 54 enterprises cover two highly polluting sectors —fashion and construction — in three countries, namely, the Netherlands, France, and Germany, which are among the top EU polluters in both sectors. The methodology involves scoring the case companies using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) where the sustainability indicators serve as criteria to produce an overall triple bottom line (TBL) score (for people planet and profit) following Elkington (1994) that represents balanced sustainability. Each of the elements of the business models from value proposition, value creation, value delivery and value capture will be scored on the indicators for the three dimensions of sustainability. 

A conclusion on the benefits of regenerative versus circular economy business models in terms of the triple bottom line will be made with some policy implications drawn, using lessons learned from the case studies including improvements in materiality indicators needed to measure the concept of regeneration. Overall, regenerative business models reveal more balanced sustainability in almost all case companies compared to circular models due to value creation across the entire chain from upstream suppliers to downstream consumers.

References:
[1] Bocken, N., Short, SW., Rana, P. & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42-56. Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039.
[2] Bocken, N. & Short, S. (2016). Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: Experiences and opportunities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18: 41-61, Elsevier.
[3] Bocken, N. & Short, S. (2021). Unsustainable business models ―Recognizing and resolving institutionalized social and environmental harm. Journal of Cleaner Production 312 (1): 127828.
[4] Braungart, M. & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press, New York, 208 pages.
[5] Capital Institute (2023). Eight Principles of a Regenerative Economy. Downloaded from https://capitalinstitute.org/ on 8 July 2024.
[6] Christian-Wahl, D. (2017). Towards a Regenerative Economy. Age of Awareness. Downloaded from https://medium.com on 10 July 2024.
[7] Christian-Wahl, D. (2021). Circular Economies and Regenerative Cultures. Age of Awareness. downloaded from https://medium.com on 10 July 2024.
[8] Circulab (2024). Regenerative and circular economy, what is it? Downloaded from https://circulab.com/regenerative-economy-definition/ on 10 July 2024.
[9] Clugston, R. (2011). Ethical Framework for a Sustainable World: Earth Charter Plus 10 Conference and Follow up. ESD Happenings Reports, Vol. 5(2): 173-176. SAGE Publications.
[10] East, M. (2020). The Transition from Sustainable to Regenerative Development. Ecocycles 6(1): 106-109. Downloaded from https://www.ecocycles.net/ojs/index.php/ecocycles/article/view/168.
[11] Fath, B., Fiscus, D., Goerner, S., Berea, A. & Ulanowicz, R. (2023). Global Transitions 1: 15-27. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2019.02.002.
[12] Haanaes, K. (2016). Why All Businesses Should Embrace Sustainability. International institute for Management Development (IMD), November. Downloadable at www.imd.org.
[13] Konietzko. J., Das, A. & Bocken, N. (2023). Towards Regenerative Business Models: A Necessary shift? Sustainable Production and Consumption 38: 372-388, Elsevier.
[14] Lianos, T. & Pseiridis, A. (2015). Sustainable Welfare and Optimum Population Size. Environment, Development and Sustainability (19 September). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015- 9711-5.
[15] Mustafa, OMA & Lengyel, P. (2022). Circular Economy: A Bibliometric Mapping. Journal of Agricultural Informatics (ISSN 20610-862X) 2022, 13, 1: 36-45, doi: 10.17700/jai.2022.13.1.650.
[16] Nielsen, C. & Lund, M. (2014). An Introduction to Business Models. In Nielsen, C. & Lund M. (Eds.) The Basics of Business Models, Vol. 1, No. 1. Copenhagen: BookBoon.com/Ventus Publishing Aps.
[17] Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2005). Clarifying business models: origins, present and future of the concept. Communications for the Association of Information Systems 15 (May).
[18] Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
[19] Potting, J. & Hanemaaijer, A., eds. (2018). Circular Economy: what we want to know and can measure - Framework and Baseline Assessment for monitoring the progress of the circular economy of the Netherlands. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
[20] Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change 17 (5-6), 133-144, Wiley Online.
[21] Rockström, J., and Sachs, J. D. (2013). Sustainable Development and Planetary Boundaries. High Level Panel on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. The Sustainable Development.
[22] Sphera (2021). Regenerative Design. Downloaded from https://www.spherasotenible.com on 10 May 2024.
[23] Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S.R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C.A., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G.M., Persson, L.M., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., Sörlin, S. (2015): Planetary Boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science Vol. 347, Issue 6223, 1259855.
[24] Teece, D. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning 43: 172-194. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003.
[25] Toth, G. (2019). Circular Economy and its Comparison with 14 Other Business Sustainability Movements. Resources 2019, 8, 159, doi:10.3390/resources8040159.
[26] Wetzel, K.R. & Wetzel, J. F. (1994). Sizing the Earth: recognition of economic carrying capacity. Ecological Economics 12: 13-21.
[27] World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. UN Documents: Gathering a Body of Global Agreements.


14:45: [EconomyTuePM206] OL Invited
FINANCING PEACE: ENABLING AN ELUSIVE SDG
Norman Dytianquin1
1Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Maastricht, Netherlands
Paper ID: 346 [Abstract]

This paper will focus on the issue of financing for peace and the various initiatives of mostly multilateral institutions and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to help fund conflict-driven countries and territories that are obstacles to the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The study is mostly qualitative in approach and uses secondary data through internet searches and data mining of relevant sources. 

Throughout world history, a huge treasury was needed to finance wars. This is mostly done through taxation, borrowing mostly through war bonds (or liberty bonds) and printing of money, which was not only inflationary but also led to the collapse of the gold standard. The latest Ukraine-Russia war showcases how new financing innovations like cryptocurrencies were used by both sides to not only finance the war for Ukraine but to bypass the economic sanctions as well imposed by the West on Russia. But if war is financed, so can peace. The first historically known initiative for peace financing was the Marshall Plan or European Recovery Program which was a $13.3 billion aid package instigated by the USA in 1947 to help reconstruct Europe from the ravages of the Second World War but also to establish American hegemony which was threatened by the spread of communism at that time.

The first part of this paper is devoted to a literature review of the case for peace by looking at the state of conflicts and war besetting the world to date to set the tone for the need for peace financing. The Geneva Academy lists about 114 armed conflicts on its website as of 2022 with about 45 in the Middle East and North Africa; 35 in Africa; 21 in Asia; 6 in Latin America; and 7 in Europe. The deteriorating trend of peacebuilding is confirmed by the Global Peace Index of 2023 with an average 0.42 percent decline and similar disturbing trends in the Fragile States Index and its component indicators like securities threat, group grievance, factionalized elite, state legitimacy, human rights and rule of law, demographic pressures, public services, refugee and displaced people, human flight and brain drain, uneven economic development and economic decline; and the progress of the nuclear arms build-up. Peace has thus been elusive as an SDG and therefore poses a threat to the attainment of the 16 other SDGs. 

This is followed by a description of the Earth Charter and the SDGs. The fourth pillar of the Earth Charter is Democracy, Non-Violence, and Peace. The Earth Charter is the ethical foundation of the SDGs consisting of 16 principles around four pillars or cornerstones. Its fourth pillar is linked to SDG 16 on Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions. SDG 16 has a transformative and an enabling role among all the SDGs. Its inclusion as a sustainability goal was aimed to bridge the gap in the previous millennial development goals (MDGs) which overlooked attention to peace, security, and institutions. The Earth Charter is a call for a change in worldview from an anthropocentric or egocentric mindset to an anthropocentric or eco-centric one. The predominance of the egocentric view explains why the attainment of peace has been elusive. 

The literature review continues with the relationship between peace and development and the competing theoretical views about their interrelatedness and compatibility. The discussion revolves around the inclusivist and exclusivist approaches where peace and development are either symbiotically related in the former or are two separate tracks that explain the political opposition to the inclusion of SDG16 among the sustainable development goals.

The article proceeds with the major sources of peace financing and the various financing initiatives for peace by multilateral institutions, regional financial institutions and trading blocs and NGOs. The various instrumentalities for peace financing will be explained such as peace-building response funds, peace bonds and peace dividends evolving mostly from the NGOs. The analytical part of this paper will discuss the progress of how financing for peace has been implemented in a war or conflict zone and its effects and impact. Finally, a conclusion is made on lessons learned from peace financing and how international business can contribute pro-actively in the effort to finance and secure peace in the world that makes SDG16 not only an enabler but an enabled SDG. 

References:
[1] Berdal, M. (2014). Peacebuilding and Development in Bruce Currie Adler et al (eds). International Development: Ideas, Experience and Prospects. Oxford University Press.
[2] Berdal, M. & Mouzavizadeh (2010). Investing for Peace. Survival, Volume 52, No. 2. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
[3] Blumberg, B., Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2014). Business Research Methods, Fourth Edition, Chapter 11, London: McGraw Hill.
[4] Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 42-56.
[5] Briner, R. (2015). The new 2015 Top 500 NGOs is out. The Global Journal. Downloadable from https://www.theglobaljournal.net/article/view/1171/index.html
[6] Bullock, C. (1917). Financing the War. Quarterly Journal of Economics 31:3, 357-79. Oxford University Press.
[7] Castrovilli, M. (2023). Russia-Ukraine War: How both sides of the conflict have used crypto to win. Cointelegraph Newsletter.
[8] Clinton, L. & Whisnant, R. (2014). Model Behaviour: 20 Business Model Innovations for Sustainability. SustainAbility.
[9] Clugston, R. (2011). Ethical Framework for a Sustainable World: Earth Charter Plus 10 Conference and Follow up. ESD Happenings Reports, Vol. 5(2): 173-176. SAGE Publications
[10] De Long, B. & Eichengreen, B. (1991). Marshall Plan: History’s Most Successful Structural Adjustment Program. NBER Working Paper 3899.
[11] Dermarkar, S. & Hazgui, M. (2022). How the Russia-Ukraine Conflict has put Cryptocurrencies in the Spotlight. The Conversation Newsletter. HEC Montreal.
[12] Desai V. M. (2018). Collaborative stakeholder engagement: An integration between theories of organizational legitimacy and learning. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 220–244
[13] De Wit, F. (2018). An Ethical Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals: Ruud Lubbers and the Earth Charter Initiative. Instituto de Ciências Sociais. Downloadable from https://ambienteterritoriosociedade-ics.org).
[14] Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review 36: 90-100.
[15] Evaldsson, AK. (2005). The Relationship between Peace and Development: a Historical Explanation, Journal for Contemporary History, Vol. 30, Issue 2.
[16] Finance for Peace (2024a). Peace Bond Standard. Version 3.0. Finance for Peace. Geneva, Switzerland. Downloaded from https://financeforpeace.org. on 25 January 2024.
[17] Finance for Peace (2024b). Peace Equity Standard. Version 3.0/ Finance for Peace. Geneva, Switzerland. Downloaded from https://finaceforpeace.org on 30 January 2024.
[18] Geneva Academy (2022). Today’s Armed Conflicts. Downloadable from https://geneva academy.ch/ galleries/ today-s-armed-conflicts.
[19] Hamm, B. (ed.) (2022). SDG 16 Survey Initiative Implementation Manual. Joint project of UNDP, UNODC, OCHR, UNOG.
[20] Haanaes, K. (2016). Why All Businesses Should Embrace Sustainability. International Institute for Management Development (IMD), November. Downloadable at www.imd.org.
[21] Herremans, I., Nazari, J. & Mahmoudian, F. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement and Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 138 (3): 417-435.
[22] Hyslop, D. (2022). Summary Rationale for Peace Bonds and Peace Finance. Powerpoint. Based on Peace Bond feasibility study available at www.financeforpeace,org.
[23] Institute for Economics and Peace (2023). Global Peace Index 2023: Measuring Peace in a Complex World. Sydney, Australia.
[24] ICAN (2022). International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) Annual Report.
[25] Kantowitz, R. (2018). Innovative Financing to Sustain Peace: An Explainer. Center on International Cooperation. Downloadable on https://cic.nyu.edu/resources.
[26] Kindleberger, C. (1968). Marshall Plan and the Cold War. International Journal 23:3. Canada International Council.
[27] Kühne, W. (1996). Winning the peace: Concept and lessons learned of post-conflict peacebuilding. Ebenhausen, Germany: Research Institute for International Affairs.
[28] Kunz, D. (1997). The Marshall Plan Reconsidered: A Complex of Motives. Foreign Affairs 76:3 (May-June), 162-170.
[29] Linnanen, L. & Panapanaan, V. (2002). Roadmapping CSR in Finnish Companies. Helsinki University Technology, as cited in Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics (May 2003), 44, (2/3). Corporate Sustainability Conference 2002: The Impact of CSR on Management Disciplines (May 2003), pp. 95-105.
[30] Lodhia, S., Kaur, A., & Kuruppu, S. C. (2022). The disclosure of sustainable development goals (SDGs) by the top 50 Australian companies: Substantive or symbolic legitimation? Meditari Accountancy Research.
[31] Lubbers, R., Roerink, A., & Warnars, L. (2015). Article on the Earth Charter as the Foundation for the SDGs. Downloadable from https://earthcharter.org.
[32] Magid, J. (2012). The Marshall Plan. Advances in Historical Studies 01(01): 1-7.
[33] Marrewijk, M. (2013). Concepts and Definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. In Michalos, A., Poff, D. (eds), Journal of Business Ethics. Advances in Business Ethics Research, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_32.
[34] McLaren, D. (2004). Global Stakeholders: Corporate Accountability and Investor Engagement. Corporate Governance an International Review 12: 2 (April). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00360.x.
[35] Miller, M. (2000). Poverty as a cause of wars?. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Volume 25, Issue 4: 273-297. Sage Journals.
[36] Molloy, S. (2019). Peace Agreements and Trust Funds. Political Settlements Research Program .
[37] Mueller, H. 2017. “How Much Is Prevention Worth?” Background paper for the United Nations–World Bank Flagship Study, Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflict, World Bank, Washington, DC.
[38] Nicolo, G., Zampone, G., De Iorio, S., & Sannino, G. (2023). Does SDG disclosure reflect corporate underlying sustainability performance? Evidence from UN Global Compact participants. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting/Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 35(1), 214–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12194.
[39] Nielsen, C. & Lund, M. (2014). An introduction to business models, in Nielsen, C. & Lund M. (Eds.) The Basics of Business Models, Vol. 1, No. 1. Copenhagen: BookBoon.com/Ventus Publishing Aps.
[40] Osterwalder, A. & Pigneur, Y. (2002). Business Models and Their Elements. Position paper on International Workshop on Business Models. Lausanne, Switzerland, 4-5 October 2002.
[41] OXFAM, Mhlanga, R., Gneiting, U., & Agarwal, N. (2018). Walking the talk: Assessing companies' progress from SDG Rhetoric to Action. Downloaded https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620550/dpwalking-the-talkbusiness-sdgs-240918-en.pdf on 26 May 2024.
[42] Palathingal, A. (ed.) (2017). Business and SDG 16: Contributing to Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies. SDG Fund. In collaboration with University of Pennsylvania Law School and support of McDermott Will & Emery.
[43] Pezzolo, L. (2005). Bonds and Government Debt in Italian City States, 1250-1650 in W. Goetzmann & G. Rouwenhorst (eds.) The Origins of Value. Oxford University Press.
[44] Pizzi, S., Del Baldo, M., Caputo, F., & Venturelli, A. (2022). Voluntary disclosure of sustainable development goals in mandatory non‐financial reports: The moderating role of cultural dimension. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 33(1), 83–106
[45] Poole, L. et al. (2019). Financing the Nexus: Gaps and Opportunities from a Field Perspective. FAO, NRC and UNDP.
[46] Reliefweb (2022). Principles for Quality Financing for Peacebuilding and Conflict Prevention. Paper prepared by Life and Peace Institute, Dag Hammarskjold Foundation & Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict.
[47] Richardson, J. (2008). The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strategic Change 17 (5-6), 133-144, Wiley Online.
[48] Roth, JP (2006). The Final Collapse of the Gold Standard in September 1936. Speech delivered at the Swiss National Bank on 27 April 2007.
[49] Rupesinghe, K., Sciarone, P. & Goor, L. (eds.) (1996). Between Development and Destruction: An Enquiry into the Causes of Conflict in Post-Colonial States. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[50] Selgin, G. (2013). The Rise and Fall of the Gold Standard in the United States. Policy Analysis, Cato Institute.
[51] Smits, M., Hyslop, D., & Vinci, R.(2023). Mapping Investment Guidance for Peace. Switzerland.
[52] Smoljan, J. (2010). The relationship between peacebuilding and development. Conflict, Security and Development 3:2, 233-250.
[53] Teece, D. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning 43: 172-194. Elsevier.
[54] United Nations (2013). Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding. MDG Achievement Fund.
[55] United Nations (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
[56] United Nations (2021). Financing for Peacebuilding: A Primer. Downloadable from https://www.un.org/peacebuilding/content/financing-peacebuilding-primer. on 15 July 2024.
[57] University of Pennsylvania Law School (2017). Business and SDG 16.
[58] van der Waal, J. W. H., & Thijssens, T. (2020). Corporate involvement in sustainable development goals: Exploring the territory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119625.
[59] Walton, O., 2011. Helpdesk Research Report: Trust Funds in Fragile and Low Capacity States. Governance and Social Development Resource Centre. Available from; http://gsdrc.org/docs/open/hd740.pdf.
[60] Wolff, J., Witt, A., Stappenbeck, J., Schnabel, S., Peez, A., Junk, J., Coni-Zimmer, M., Christian, B., Birchinger, S., & Bethke, F. (2020). Peace and Development 2020: An analysis of recent experiences and findings. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt.
[61] Wollenschlaeger, Z. (2022). The First Crypto War: Russia, Ukraine and the Role of Cryptocurrency. Towson University Journal of International Affairs.
[62] World Bank (2022). State and Peace Building Fund Annual Report 2022.
[63] World Bank (1995). Working with NGOs. Operations Policy Department, World Bank, March.
[64] World Bank and the United Nations (2018). Pathways for Peace: Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Violent Conflicts.
[65] Zamfir, I. (2022). Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions: EU Support for Implementing SDG16 Worldwide. EU Parliament Briefing.


15:45 COFFEE BREAK/POSTERS - Ballroom Foyer