FLOGEN Logo
In Honor of Nobel Laureate Dr. Aaron Ciechanover

SIPS 2025 logo
SIPS 2025 takes place from November 17-20, 2025 at the Dusit Thani Mactan Resort in Cebu, Philippines

Honoree Banner

More than 400 abstracts submitted from over 50 countries
Abstracts Still Accepted for a Limited Time



Featuring many Nobel Laureates and other Distinguished Guests


Back

SANTILLI'S PROGRESSIVE VERIFICATION OF EINSTEIN'S DETERMINISM
Arun Muktibodh1
1Mohota College of Science, Nagpur, India

PAPER: 355/Mathematics/Plenary (Oral) OS
SCHEDULED: 16:45/Tue. 18 Nov. 2025/Dusit 3

ABSTRACT:

R.M. Santilli’s seminal contribution provides formulation of novel mathematical, physical and chemical methods to show that interior dynamical systems admit classical counterpart in full accordance with the EPR argument via representation by Isomathematics. The Lie-isotopic branch of hadronic mechanics, wherein a system of extended protons and neutrons in conditions of partial mutual penetration in a nuclear structure verifies the following properties: 1) Admits, for the first time, explicit and concretrealizations of Bohm’s hidden variables. 2) Violates Bell’s inequalities 3) Verifies the broadening of Heisenberg’s indeterminacy principle for electromagnetic interactions of point-like particles in vacuum into the isouncertainty principle of hadronic mechanics, also called Einstein’s isodeterminism for extended hadrons in conditions of partial mutual penetration. Moreover, Einstein’s ‘Determinism’ for strong interactions is progressively achieved in the interior of hadrons, nuclei and stars, and is fully achieved in the interior of gravitational collapse known as ‘Isodeterminism’. In this paper we study Santilli’s seminal work in verifying Einstein’s Determinism.

REFERENCES:
[1] Einstein A, Podolsky B and Rosen N Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935), //www.eprdebates.org/docs/epr-argument.pdf
[2] Santilli R M Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N.Rosen prediction that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory, I: Basic methods, Ratio Mathematica 38,5-69 (2020), //eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-i.pdf
[3] Santilli R M Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen prediction that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory, II: Apparent proof of the EPR argument, Ratio Mathematica 38, 71-138 (2020), //eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-ii.pdf
[4] Santilli R M Studies on A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen prediction that quantum mechanics is not a complete theory, III: Illustrative examples and applications, Ratio Mathematica 38, 139-222 (2020), //eprdebates.org/docs/epr-review-iii.pdf